Skip to content

Conversation

@lukaszstolarczuk
Copy link
Contributor

When action is used as composite, its steps don't disaply the actual 'name' defined for each step. Instead a full command to execute is displayed. To work around it we can put name as a comment in the first line of the command.

When action is used as composite, its steps don't disaply the actual 'name'
defined for each step. Instead a full command to execute is displayed.
To work around it we can put name as a comment in the first line of the command.
@lukaszstolarczuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

lukaszstolarczuk commented Oct 29, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

@PatKamin PatKamin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice workaround

@lukaszstolarczuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

@intel/dpcpp-devops-reviewers , can you please take a look at this change? It simply adds extra names printed in workflows.

@lukaszstolarczuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers, can you please merge it?

@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel merged commit 066e266 into intel:sycl Oct 31, 2025
38 of 41 checks passed
@lukaszstolarczuk lukaszstolarczuk deleted the fix-steps-names branch October 31, 2025 18:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants